Economy of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, 2023, No 3
Contents
AGRARIAN ECONOMIC POLICY
Chinarov V.I. – Scientific maintenance for the Strategy of the animal husbandry
development at Russian Federation (p. 2-9)
Golubev A.V. – Rural local economy as a shock absorber of contradictions in agrarian
dynamics (p.10-15)
Essaulenko D.V., Shelkovnikov S.A. – Agricultural management models (p. 16-19)
AIC ENTERPRISES IN MARKET ECONOMY
Mazloev V.Z., Khairullina O.I. – Current status of pork exports and growth prospects (p. 20-27)
Minakov I.A. – Food security in the sphere of potato consumption (p. 28-33
Morhachov I.V., Dosova A.G., Daeva T.V. – Key problems of the risk management system in agricultural companies (p. 34-38
Frolova E.Yu., Alekseeva S.A. – Conference «Food security: new challenges and solutions in a changing
world». Review of the presentations of the participants of the Conference (p. 39-50)
LAND MANAGEMENT
Semyashkin G.M., Semyashkin E.G. – The expansion of food exports of the Russian Federation depends on the
use of abandoned land (p. 51-55)
FOOD, RESOURCES AND TECHNICS MARKET
Sobolev O.S. – Ecology, weather conditions and food prices in 2022 (p. 56-64)
DOI 10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-2-9
p. 2-9
Original article
JEL: O13, Q16, Q18
Scientific
maintenance for the Strategy of the animal husbandry development at Russian
Federation
Vladimir I. Chinarov
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Moscow region, Russia
Abstract. To present the role of science in the country’s
economy development, the possibilities of the Russian agro-industrial complex
in solving the problem of food independence are shown on the example of
government approach for providing of meat products to the population. According
to our estimates, in 2021 it was produced the products on 1683.5 billion rubles
by the meat industry of Russian Federation, the meat was imported on 96.2
billion rubles, and the import dependence of the domestic meat market (in value
terms) decreased to 5.7%. In 2010 these figures were 683.5 billion rubles,
171.1 billion rubles and 28.0%, respectively. During the implementation of the
“Strategy of the animal husbandry development at Russian Federation for the
period up to 2020”, the lack of meat products in the diet of our population was
completely eliminated, while in 2021 domestic meat producers provided 107.3% of
the needs of rational nutrition standards and the share of domestic producers
at meat market reached to 95.9%. The import dependence on meat products at our
country is within acceptable limits and amounts (in natural terms) to only
4.1%. Optimization of the industry structure and intensification of animal
husbandry on the basis of the latest achievements provided by agricultural
science in short term ensured the market saturation with meat products in the
required assortment and created prerequisites for the cost-effective management
of all industries.
Keywords: animal husbandry, development strategy,
self-sufficiency, beef, pork, lamb, poultry
Acknowledgements: the study was carried
out according to the State Task No. FGGN-2021-0003.
Information about the author:
V.I. Chinarov – Doctor of Economics, Head
of laboratory (vchinarov@yandex.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 07.02.2023,
approved after reviewing on 27.02.2023, accepted for publication on 28.02.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-10-15
p. 10-15
Original article
Rural local economy
as a shock absorber of contradictions in agrarian dynamics
Aleksey V. Golubev
VIAPI named after A.A. Nikonov is a branch of
the Federal Scientific Center for Agrarian Economics and Social Development of
Rural Territories – VNIIESH, Moscow, Russia
Abstract. In agriculture in Russia, there are
multidirectional trends that generate contradictions. For
example, between the growth of output and the absence of even simple
reproduction, between the introduction of advanced technologies and the
aggravation of rural unemployment problems. The rural local economy
(RLE) is considered as a means of their systemic solution. It is compared with
large agricultural organizations and agricultural holdings. A number of
advantages of the rural local economy have been identified, which make it
possible to mitigate the negative impact of contradictory trends in
agricultural dynamics on the Russian countryside and to stop possible risks.
The endogenous nature of the SLE is emphasized, which is of particular
importance given the complex geopolitical situation and the need to mobilize
internal sources of growth. The conclusion is made about the need for priority
development of rural local economy as a way to resolve many socio-economic
problems of agrarian Russia.
Keywords: rural local economy, agriculture, trends,
contradictions, efficiency
Information about the author:
A.V. Golubev – Doctor of Economics, Professor,
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Chief Researcher
(avgolubev@viapi.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 14.12.2022,
approved after reviewing on 30.01.2023, accepted for publication on 01.02.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-16-19
p. 16-19
Original article
Agricultural
management models
Dmitry V.
Essaulenko1, Sergey A. Shelkovnikov2
1,2Novosibirsk State Agrarian University,
Novosibirsk, Russia
Abstract. The article indicates that, depending on whose interests
are put at the forefront, it is possible to talk about political-conjunctural, economic-centric, ecological-centric and
homocentric models of agricultural management. In the absence of a
comprehensive management model, it is necessary to state numerous and acute
conflicts of interests - the state’s goal of increasing agricultural production
may meet resistance from environmental organizations, the interest of
agricultural workers in wage growth is not expected to find a response in terms
of commercial goals of agricultural producers, because it leads to an increase
in costs, etc. The target settings of each interested group should be
considered not in isolation, but in a comprehensive manner, within the
framework of the four-component management model proposed by the authors,
implemented not only on the internal management circuit (micro-level, regional agrosystems), but also on the external management circuit (meso-level – agriculture of the country, macro-level –
global agrosystems). The alignment and coordination
of the interests of all parties is proposed to be achieved through the
implementation of a program of public investment in the country’s agriculture.
Keywords: management model, political-conjunctural
model, economic-centric model, ecocentric model,
homocentric model, management contour, internal management contour, external
management contour, subsidization, public investment
Information about the authors:
D.V. Essaulenko – Candidate of Economic
Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of State
and Municipal Administration (essau@ngs.ru )
S.A. Shelkovnikov – Doctor of Economics,
Professor, Professor of the Department of Accounting and Financial Technologies
(shelkovnikov1@rambler.ru )
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 27.12.2022,
approved after reviewing on 07.02.2023, accepted for publication on 08.02.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-20-27
p. 20-27
Original article
Current status of
pork exports and growth prospects
Vitaly Z.
Mazloev1, Olga I. Khairullina2
1VNIOPTUSKH is a branch of the Federal
Scientific Center for Agrarian Economics and Social Development of Rural
Territories – VNIIESH, Moscow, Russia
2Perm State Agrarian and Technological
University named after Academician D.N. Pryanishnikov,
Perm, Russia
Abstract. The article analyzes the composition, structure
and directions of pork export. The export profile of key exporting countries is
presented. Key importers, market share, the structure of the commodity
nomenclature for pork are established. Inter-regional production
differentiation and business consolidation are revealed in this segment. The
key problems hindering the growth of Russian pork exports on the international
market have been identified. Recommendations for expanding the geography of
deliveries for further diversification of risks are proposed. Perspective
directions of export development are listed.
Keywords: pork, export, trends, consumption, production
Information about the authors:
V.Z. Mazloev – Doctor of Economics, Professor,
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Chief Researcher
(mazloevv@mail.ru)
O.I. Khairullina – Doctor of Economics,
Professor (o.i.khayrullina@mail.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 16.01.2023,
approved after reviewing on 25.01.2023, accepted for publication on 30.01.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-28-33
p. 28-33
Original article
Food security in the
sphere of potato consumption
Ivan A. Minakov
Michurinsk State Agrarian
University, Michurinsk, Russia
Abstract. During the period of implementation of the State
Program for the Development of Agriculture, indicators characterizing food
security in the field of potato consumption have decreased and are at a level
below the standard. The level of self–sufficiency of the population with
potatoes decreased from 96.4% to 89.1% with a threshold value of 95%, economic
accessibility - from 104.4% to 93.3% with a threshold value of 100%, and its
consumption per capita per year - from 94 to 84 kg with a rational nutrition
rate of 90 kg. This problem arose as a result of a decline in potato production
from 24.0 to 18.3 million tons and an increase in its imports from 763 to 1016
thousand tons. The reduction in the gross potato harvest in Russia is due to a
sharp decline in its production in households, although they still remain the
main producers (63.9%). In order to reach the threshold values of food security
indicators, it is necessary to increase potato production to 21.7 million tons,
or increase by 18.6% compared to the achieved level. It is possible to increase
its production only through the development of potato growing in agricultural
organizations and farms with state support. This will be facilitated by the use
of modern potato cultivation technologies, improving seed production and improving
the quality of seed material, developing a potato storage base in the places of
its production, creating consumer cooperatives, reducing import dependence as a
result of the development of domestic breeding and agricultural engineering.
Keywords: potato growing, food independence, physical and
economic accessibility, import substitution, seed production, cooperation,
state support
Information about the author:
I.A. Minakov – Doctor of Economics, Professor
of the Department of Economics and Commerce (ekapk@yandex.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 20.12.2022,
approved after reviewing on 18.01.2023, accepted for publication on 23.01.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-34-38
p. 34-38
Original article
Key problems of the
risk management system in agricultural companies
Illia V.
Morhachov1, Aijan G. Dosova2,
Tatyana V. Daeva3
1,2,3Volgograd State Agricultural
University, Volgograd, Russia
Abstract. The article clarifies the list of key problems
of the risk management system in agro-industrial companies, which are related
to the practical quantitative assessment of the level of economic risk. Such
objective problems include: the impossibility of an accurate assessment of the
probability of an adverse event; narrow competence of risk managers, which does
not allow to see all dangerous factors; the dynamics
of the dangerousness of risk factors, which is manifested in the dynamic
variable of the probability of the occurrence of adverse events. The presence
of these objective problems makes the methods of quantitative assessment of
risks in commercial organizations more academic than practical. These problems
explain the rarity of the profession of risk managers and risk assessment systems
in agro-industrial companies. Exceptions are considered, when the probabilities
of the occurrence of adverse events are determined in practice, but this mainly
applies to insurance organizations or does not apply to socio-economic systems.
Expected losses are considered as an indicator that directly (and not
indirectly) allows determining the level of economic risk. Their value is
defined as the product of the probability of the occurrence of an adverse event
by possible losses. Other indicators of quantitative assessment are indirect
and do not allow to adequately determine the level of the corresponding risk.
The use of indirect relevant indicators in business plans is considered rather
as a formalism.
Keywords: agro-industrial companies, quantitative
assessment of risks, probability of an adverse event, risk factor, risk
management system
Information about the authors:
I.V. Morhachov – Doctor of Economic Sciences,
Professor of the Department Management and Logistics in the Agro-industrial
Complex (Morgachov-ilya@yandex.com)
A.G. Dosova – Candidate of Economic Sciences,
Associate Professor of the Department Management and Logistics in the
Agro-industrial Complex (aijanraskalieva@mail.ru)
T.V. Daeva – Candidate of agricultural sciences, Associate
Professor of Department Management and Logistics in the Agro-industrial Complex
(daeva_tatyana@volgau.com)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 05.12.2022,
approved after reviewing and corresponding author’s revision on 16.01.2023,
accepted for publication on 23.01.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-39-50
p. 39-50
Review
The Conference «Food
security: new challenges and solutions in a changing world». Review of the presentations of the participants
of the Conference
Elena Y.
Frolova1, Svetlana A. Alekseeva2
1A. A. Nikonov VIAPI –
Branch of the FSBI FSC VNIIESH
2FSBI FSC VNIIESH
Information about the authors::
E.Yu. Frolova
– Ph.D. in Economics, Leading Researcher (efrolova@inbox.ru)
S.A. Alekseeva – Ph.D. in Economics, Leading
Researcher (asa25@inbox.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 01.03.2023,
approved and accepted for publication on 02.03.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-51-55
p. 51-55
Original article
The expansion of food
exports of the Russian Federation depends on the use of abandoned land
Grigoriy
M. Semyashkin1, Efim G. Semyashkin2
1Institute of Retraining and Advanced Training of
employees of the Agro-industrial complex of the Komi
Republic, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russia
2MGIMO University of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Abstract. The relevance of the subject of the study is
due to the need to introduce abandoned agricultural land into economic
circulation in Russia. The article provides a calculation of the possible terms
of involvement in the turnover of land in the context of federal districts and
the most problematic regions. Significant periods of development of abandoned
agricultural lands indicate the need to change approaches to solving this
problem. The article provides a theoretical justification for the expedient use
of part of the rental income received from food exports to finance measures to
involve unused land in agricultural turnover. Proposals are formulated for the
possible allotment of land plots to distinguished participants of the SVO.
Keywords: unused agricultural land, deposit land,
involvement in turnover, food export, differential rent of the first and second
types, absolute rent, price disparity, sources of financing of measures
Highlights:
- an increase in Russian exports is possible
due to the development of abandoned agricultural land, but this will require additional
investment;
- it is advisable to direct rental sources of
income from food exports to the development of fallow lands;
- it is necessary to change state approaches to
solving the problem of putting unused agricultural land into circulation;
- it is possible revival the class of
landowners, initiative owners by allotting land to distinguished participants
of SVO.
Information about the authors:
G.M. Semyashkin – Doctor of Economics,
Professor, Rector (insapk@mail.ru)
E.G. Semyashkin – Seeker of Academic Degree
(semyashkin-efim@mail.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 06.02.2023,
approved after reviewing on 15.02.2023, accepted for publication on 16.02.2023
DOI
10.31442/0235-2494-2023-0-3-56-64
p. 56-64
Original article
Ecology, weather conditions
and food prices in 2022
Oleg S. Sobolev
VIAPI named after A.A. Nikonov is a branch of
the Federal Scientific Center for Agrarian Economics and Social Development of
Rural Territories – VNIIESH, Moscow, Russia
Abstract. The article provides a list of countries with
the highest greenhouse gas emissions affecting weather conditions. An algorithm
for finding an estimate of the resulting function, depending on many factors,
on the statistics of the grain market of the Russian Federation is presented. The
algorithm is used to analyze the grain market of the Russian Federation. The
statistics of producer prices and consumer prices for food in Russia, the EU
and the USA in the 4th quarter of 2022 are compared.
Keywords: greenhouse gas emissions, drought, producer
prices for food, record grain harvest in Russia, grain market analysis,
evaluation of the resulting function, pricing factors
Information about the author:
O.S. Sobolev – PhD (Engineering), Leading
Researcher (oleg209sob@viapi.ru)
The article was submitted to the editorial office on 16.02.2023,
approved after reviewing on 20.02.2023, accepted for publication on 21.02.2023